Merging gMock, 2

This commit is contained in:
Gennadiy Civil
2018-04-05 16:09:17 -04:00
parent 7e5f90d378
commit fe402c2779
9 changed files with 576 additions and 423 deletions

View File

@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
#include <map>
#include <set>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include "gmock/gmock.h"
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
@@ -99,12 +100,19 @@ void ExpectationBase::RetireAllPreRequisites()
return;
}
for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it = immediate_prerequisites_.begin();
it != immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) {
ExpectationBase* const prerequisite = it->expectation_base().get();
if (!prerequisite->is_retired()) {
prerequisite->RetireAllPreRequisites();
prerequisite->Retire();
::std::vector<ExpectationBase*> expectations(1, this);
while (!expectations.empty()) {
ExpectationBase* exp = expectations.back();
expectations.pop_back();
for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it =
exp->immediate_prerequisites_.begin();
it != exp->immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) {
ExpectationBase* next = it->expectation_base().get();
if (!next->is_retired()) {
next->Retire();
expectations.push_back(next);
}
}
}
}
@@ -114,11 +122,18 @@ void ExpectationBase::RetireAllPreRequisites()
bool ExpectationBase::AllPrerequisitesAreSatisfied() const
GTEST_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_REQUIRED_(g_gmock_mutex) {
g_gmock_mutex.AssertHeld();
for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it = immediate_prerequisites_.begin();
it != immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) {
if (!(it->expectation_base()->IsSatisfied()) ||
!(it->expectation_base()->AllPrerequisitesAreSatisfied()))
return false;
::std::vector<const ExpectationBase*> expectations(1, this);
while (!expectations.empty()) {
const ExpectationBase* exp = expectations.back();
expectations.pop_back();
for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it =
exp->immediate_prerequisites_.begin();
it != exp->immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) {
const ExpectationBase* next = it->expectation_base().get();
if (!next->IsSatisfied()) return false;
expectations.push_back(next);
}
}
return true;
}
@@ -127,19 +142,28 @@ bool ExpectationBase::AllPrerequisitesAreSatisfied() const
void ExpectationBase::FindUnsatisfiedPrerequisites(ExpectationSet* result) const
GTEST_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_REQUIRED_(g_gmock_mutex) {
g_gmock_mutex.AssertHeld();
for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it = immediate_prerequisites_.begin();
it != immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) {
if (it->expectation_base()->IsSatisfied()) {
// If *it is satisfied and has a call count of 0, some of its
// pre-requisites may not be satisfied yet.
if (it->expectation_base()->call_count_ == 0) {
it->expectation_base()->FindUnsatisfiedPrerequisites(result);
::std::vector<const ExpectationBase*> expectations(1, this);
while (!expectations.empty()) {
const ExpectationBase* exp = expectations.back();
expectations.pop_back();
for (ExpectationSet::const_iterator it =
exp->immediate_prerequisites_.begin();
it != exp->immediate_prerequisites_.end(); ++it) {
const ExpectationBase* next = it->expectation_base().get();
if (next->IsSatisfied()) {
// If *it is satisfied and has a call count of 0, some of its
// pre-requisites may not be satisfied yet.
if (next->call_count_ == 0) {
expectations.push_back(next);
}
} else {
// Now that we know next is unsatisfied, we are not so interested
// in whether its pre-requisites are satisfied. Therefore we
// don't iterate into it here.
*result += *it;
}
} else {
// Now that we know *it is unsatisfied, we are not so interested
// in whether its pre-requisites are satisfied. Therefore we
// don't recursively call FindUnsatisfiedPrerequisites() here.
*result += *it;
}
}
}
@@ -254,11 +278,13 @@ void ReportUninterestingCall(CallReaction reaction, const std::string& msg) {
case kWarn:
Log(kWarning,
msg +
"\nNOTE: You can safely ignore the above warning unless this "
"call should not happen. Do not suppress it by blindly adding "
"an EXPECT_CALL() if you don't mean to enforce the call. "
"See https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#"
"knowing-when-to-expect for details.\n",
"\nNOTE: You can safely ignore the above warning unless this "
"call should not happen. Do not suppress it by blindly adding "
"an EXPECT_CALL() if you don't mean to enforce the call. "
"See "
"https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/"
"docs/CookBook.md#"
"knowing-when-to-expect for details.\n",
stack_frames_to_skip);
break;
default: // FAIL
@@ -334,9 +360,10 @@ const char* UntypedFunctionMockerBase::Name() const
// Calculates the result of invoking this mock function with the given
// arguments, prints it, and returns it. The caller is responsible
// for deleting the result.
UntypedActionResultHolderBase*
UntypedFunctionMockerBase::UntypedInvokeWith(const void* const untyped_args)
GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex) {
UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedFunctionMockerBase::UntypedInvokeWith(
void* const untyped_args) GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(g_gmock_mutex) {
// See the definition of untyped_expectations_ for why access to it
// is unprotected here.
if (untyped_expectations_.size() == 0) {
// No expectation is set on this mock method - we have an
// uninteresting call.
@@ -355,16 +382,19 @@ UntypedFunctionMockerBase::UntypedInvokeWith(const void* const untyped_args)
// If the user allows this uninteresting call, we print it
// only when they want informational messages.
reaction == kAllow ? LogIsVisible(kInfo) :
// If the user wants this to be a warning, we print it only
// when they want to see warnings.
reaction == kWarn ? LogIsVisible(kWarning) :
// Otherwise, the user wants this to be an error, and we
// should always print detailed information in the error.
true;
// If the user wants this to be a warning, we print
// it only when they want to see warnings.
reaction == kWarn
? LogIsVisible(kWarning)
:
// Otherwise, the user wants this to be an error, and we
// should always print detailed information in the error.
true;
if (!need_to_report_uninteresting_call) {
// Perform the action without printing the call information.
return this->UntypedPerformDefaultAction(untyped_args, "Function call: " + std::string(Name()));
return this->UntypedPerformDefaultAction(
untyped_args, "Function call: " + std::string(Name()));
}
// Warns about the uninteresting call.
@@ -446,6 +476,8 @@ UntypedFunctionMockerBase::UntypedInvokeWith(const void* const untyped_args)
// Returns an Expectation object that references and co-owns exp,
// which must be an expectation on this mock function.
Expectation UntypedFunctionMockerBase::GetHandleOf(ExpectationBase* exp) {
// See the definition of untyped_expectations_ for why access to it
// is unprotected here.
for (UntypedExpectations::const_iterator it =
untyped_expectations_.begin();
it != untyped_expectations_.end(); ++it) {
@@ -508,7 +540,7 @@ bool UntypedFunctionMockerBase::VerifyAndClearExpectationsLocked()
return expectations_met;
}
static CallReaction intToCallReaction(int mock_behavior) {
CallReaction intToCallReaction(int mock_behavior) {
if (mock_behavior >= kAllow && mock_behavior <= kFail) {
return static_cast<internal::CallReaction>(mock_behavior);
}
@@ -582,9 +614,15 @@ class MockObjectRegistry {
leaked_count++;
}
if (leaked_count > 0) {
std::cout << "\nERROR: " << leaked_count
<< " leaked mock " << (leaked_count == 1 ? "object" : "objects")
<< " found at program exit.\n";
std::cout << "\nERROR: " << leaked_count << " leaked mock "
<< (leaked_count == 1 ? "object" : "objects")
<< " found at program exit. Expectations on a mock object is "
"verified when the object is destructed. Leaking a mock "
"means that its expectations aren't verified, which is "
"usually a test bug. If you really intend to leak a mock, "
"you can suppress this error using "
"testing::Mock::AllowLeak(mock_object), or you may use a "
"fake or stub instead of a mock.\n";
std::cout.flush();
::std::cerr.flush();
// RUN_ALL_TESTS() has already returned when this destructor is