Misc small updates to some debug death code, and to messages streaming to macros
This commit is contained in:
@@ -618,8 +618,8 @@ TEST_F(TestForDeathTest, ReturnIsFailure) {
|
||||
"illegal return in test statement.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests that EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH works as expected,
|
||||
// that is, in debug mode, it:
|
||||
// Tests that EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH works as expected, that is, you can stream a
|
||||
// message to it, and in debug mode it:
|
||||
// 1. Asserts on death.
|
||||
// 2. Has no side effect.
|
||||
//
|
||||
@@ -628,8 +628,8 @@ TEST_F(TestForDeathTest, ReturnIsFailure) {
|
||||
TEST_F(TestForDeathTest, TestExpectDebugDeath) {
|
||||
int sideeffect = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH(DieInDebugElse12(&sideeffect),
|
||||
"death.*DieInDebugElse12");
|
||||
EXPECT_DEBUG_DEATH(DieInDebugElse12(&sideeffect), "death.*DieInDebugElse12")
|
||||
<< "Must accept a streamed message";
|
||||
|
||||
# ifdef NDEBUG
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -644,22 +644,18 @@ TEST_F(TestForDeathTest, TestExpectDebugDeath) {
|
||||
# endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests that ASSERT_DEBUG_DEATH works as expected
|
||||
// In debug mode:
|
||||
// 1. Asserts on debug death.
|
||||
// Tests that ASSERT_DEBUG_DEATH works as expected, that is, you can stream a
|
||||
// message to it, and in debug mode it:
|
||||
// 1. Asserts on death.
|
||||
// 2. Has no side effect.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// In opt mode:
|
||||
// 1. Has side effects and returns the expected value (12).
|
||||
// And in opt mode, it:
|
||||
// 1. Has side effects but does not assert.
|
||||
TEST_F(TestForDeathTest, TestAssertDebugDeath) {
|
||||
int sideeffect = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT_DEBUG_DEATH({ // NOLINT
|
||||
// Tests that the return value is 12 in opt mode.
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(12, DieInDebugElse12(&sideeffect));
|
||||
// Tests that the side effect occurred in opt mode.
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(12, sideeffect);
|
||||
}, "death.*DieInDebugElse12");
|
||||
ASSERT_DEBUG_DEATH(DieInDebugElse12(&sideeffect), "death.*DieInDebugElse12")
|
||||
<< "Must accept a streamed message";
|
||||
|
||||
# ifdef NDEBUG
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -730,7 +726,7 @@ static void TestExitMacros() {
|
||||
// Of all signals effects on the process exit code, only those of SIGABRT
|
||||
// are documented on Windows.
|
||||
// See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dwwzkt4c(VS.71).aspx.
|
||||
EXPECT_EXIT(raise(SIGABRT), testing::ExitedWithCode(3), "");
|
||||
EXPECT_EXIT(raise(SIGABRT), testing::ExitedWithCode(3), "") << "b_ar";
|
||||
|
||||
# else
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -739,14 +735,14 @@ static void TestExitMacros() {
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ // NOLINT
|
||||
ASSERT_EXIT(_exit(0), testing::KilledBySignal(SIGSEGV), "")
|
||||
<< "This failure is expected, too.";
|
||||
<< "This failure is expected, too.";
|
||||
}, "This failure is expected, too.");
|
||||
|
||||
# endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ // NOLINT
|
||||
EXPECT_EXIT(raise(SIGSEGV), testing::ExitedWithCode(0), "")
|
||||
<< "This failure is expected.";
|
||||
<< "This failure is expected.";
|
||||
}, "This failure is expected.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -67,7 +67,8 @@ def GetFlag(flag):
|
||||
args = [COMMAND]
|
||||
if flag is not None:
|
||||
args += [flag]
|
||||
return gtest_test_utils.Subprocess(args, env=environ).output
|
||||
return gtest_test_utils.Subprocess(args, env=environ,
|
||||
capture_stderr=False).output
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def TestFlag(flag, test_val, default_val):
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ def GetShellCommandOutput(env_cmd):
|
||||
# Set and save the environment properly.
|
||||
environ = os.environ.copy()
|
||||
environ.update(env_cmd[0])
|
||||
p = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess(env_cmd[1], env=environ)
|
||||
p = gtest_test_utils.Subprocess(env_cmd[1], env=environ, capture_stderr=False)
|
||||
|
||||
return p.output
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -221,13 +221,13 @@ TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeRepeated) {
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
SCOPED_TRACE("C");
|
||||
ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should contain "
|
||||
<< "trace point A, B, and C.";
|
||||
ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should "
|
||||
<< "contain trace point A, B, and C.";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SCOPED_TRACE("D");
|
||||
ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should contain "
|
||||
<< "trace point A, B, and D.";
|
||||
ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should "
|
||||
<< "contain trace point A, B, and D.";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ def RunAndReturnOutput(extra_env, args):
|
||||
environ_copy = os.environ.copy()
|
||||
environ_copy.update(extra_env)
|
||||
|
||||
return gtest_test_utils.Subprocess([COMMAND] + args, env=environ_copy).output
|
||||
return gtest_test_utils.Subprocess([COMMAND] + args, env=environ_copy,
|
||||
capture_stderr=False).output
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def GetTestsForAllIterations(extra_env, args):
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2642,6 +2642,11 @@ TEST(StringAssertionTest, STREQ_Wide) {
|
||||
// Strings containing wide characters.
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_STREQ(L"abc\x8119", L"abc\x8120"),
|
||||
"abc");
|
||||
|
||||
// The streaming variation.
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ // NOLINT
|
||||
EXPECT_STREQ(L"abc\x8119", L"abc\x8121") << "Expected failure";
|
||||
}, "Expected failure");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests *_STRNE on wide strings.
|
||||
@@ -2668,6 +2673,9 @@ TEST(StringAssertionTest, STRNE_Wide) {
|
||||
// Strings containing wide characters.
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_STRNE(L"abc\x8119", L"abc\x8119"),
|
||||
"abc");
|
||||
|
||||
// The streaming variation.
|
||||
ASSERT_STRNE(L"abc\x8119", L"abc\x8120") << "This shouldn't happen";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests for ::testing::IsSubstring().
|
||||
@@ -4263,8 +4271,109 @@ TEST(SuccessfulAssertionTest, ASSERT_STR) {
|
||||
|
||||
namespace {
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests the message streaming variation of assertions.
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(AssertionWithMessageTest, EXPECT) {
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(1, 1) << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_NE(1, 1) << "Expected failure #1.",
|
||||
"Expected failure #1");
|
||||
EXPECT_LE(1, 2) << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_LT(1, 0) << "Expected failure #2.",
|
||||
"Expected failure #2.");
|
||||
EXPECT_GE(1, 0) << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_GT(1, 2) << "Expected failure #3.",
|
||||
"Expected failure #3.");
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_STREQ("1", "1") << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_STRNE("1", "1") << "Expected failure #4.",
|
||||
"Expected failure #4.");
|
||||
EXPECT_STRCASEEQ("a", "A") << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_STRCASENE("a", "A") << "Expected failure #5.",
|
||||
"Expected failure #5.");
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_FLOAT_EQ(1, 1) << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_DOUBLE_EQ(1, 1.2) << "Expected failure #6.",
|
||||
"Expected failure #6.");
|
||||
EXPECT_NEAR(1, 1.1, 0.2) << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(AssertionWithMessageTest, ASSERT) {
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(1, 1) << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
ASSERT_NE(1, 2) << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
ASSERT_LE(1, 2) << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
ASSERT_LT(1, 2) << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
ASSERT_GE(1, 0) << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_GT(1, 2) << "Expected failure.",
|
||||
"Expected failure.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(AssertionWithMessageTest, ASSERT_STR) {
|
||||
ASSERT_STREQ("1", "1") << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
ASSERT_STRNE("1", "2") << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
ASSERT_STRCASEEQ("a", "A") << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_STRCASENE("a", "A") << "Expected failure.",
|
||||
"Expected failure.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(AssertionWithMessageTest, ASSERT_FLOATING) {
|
||||
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(1, 1) << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
ASSERT_DOUBLE_EQ(1, 1) << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_NEAR(1,1.2, 0.1) << "Expect failure.", // NOLINT
|
||||
"Expect failure.");
|
||||
// To work around a bug in gcc 2.95.0, there is intentionally no
|
||||
// space after the first comma in the previous statement.
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests using ASSERT_FALSE with a streamed message.
|
||||
TEST(AssertionWithMessageTest, ASSERT_FALSE) {
|
||||
ASSERT_FALSE(false) << "This shouldn't fail.";
|
||||
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ // NOLINT
|
||||
ASSERT_FALSE(true) << "Expected failure: " << 2 << " > " << 1
|
||||
<< " evaluates to " << true;
|
||||
}, "Expected failure");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests using FAIL with a streamed message.
|
||||
TEST(AssertionWithMessageTest, FAIL) {
|
||||
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(FAIL() << 0,
|
||||
"0");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests using SUCCEED with a streamed message.
|
||||
TEST(AssertionWithMessageTest, SUCCEED) {
|
||||
SUCCEED() << "Success == " << 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests using ASSERT_TRUE with a streamed message.
|
||||
TEST(AssertionWithMessageTest, ASSERT_TRUE) {
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(true) << "This should succeed.";
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(true) << true;
|
||||
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ // NOLINT
|
||||
ASSERT_TRUE(false) << static_cast<const char *>(NULL)
|
||||
<< static_cast<char *>(NULL);
|
||||
}, "(null)(null)");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
|
||||
// Tests using wide strings in assertion messages.
|
||||
TEST(AssertionWithMessageTest, WideStringMessage) {
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ // NOLINT
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(false) << L"This failure is expected.\x8119";
|
||||
}, "This failure is expected.");
|
||||
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ // NOLINT
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(1, 2) << "This failure is "
|
||||
<< L"expected too.\x8120";
|
||||
}, "This failure is expected too.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests EXPECT_TRUE.
|
||||
TEST(ExpectTest, EXPECT_TRUE) {
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(true) << "Intentional success";
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_TRUE(false) << "Intentional failure #1.",
|
||||
"Intentional failure #1.");
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_TRUE(false) << "Intentional failure #2.",
|
||||
"Intentional failure #2.");
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(2 > 1); // NOLINT
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_TRUE(2 < 1),
|
||||
"Value of: 2 < 1\n"
|
||||
@@ -4288,9 +4397,14 @@ TEST(ExpectTest, ExpectTrueWithAssertionResult) {
|
||||
"Expected: true");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests EXPECT_FALSE.
|
||||
// Tests EXPECT_FALSE with a streamed message.
|
||||
TEST(ExpectTest, EXPECT_FALSE) {
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(2 < 1); // NOLINT
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(false) << "Intentional success";
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_FALSE(true) << "Intentional failure #1.",
|
||||
"Intentional failure #1.");
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_FALSE(true) << "Intentional failure #2.",
|
||||
"Intentional failure #2.");
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_FALSE(2 > 1),
|
||||
"Value of: 2 > 1\n"
|
||||
" Actual: true\n"
|
||||
@@ -4564,7 +4678,7 @@ TEST(StreamableTest, BasicIoManip) {
|
||||
|
||||
void AddFailureHelper(bool* aborted) {
|
||||
*aborted = true;
|
||||
ADD_FAILURE() << "Failure";
|
||||
ADD_FAILURE() << "Intentional failure.";
|
||||
*aborted = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4572,7 +4686,7 @@ void AddFailureHelper(bool* aborted) {
|
||||
TEST(MacroTest, ADD_FAILURE) {
|
||||
bool aborted = true;
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureHelper(&aborted),
|
||||
"Failure");
|
||||
"Intentional failure.");
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(aborted);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4605,7 +4719,6 @@ TEST(MacroTest, SUCCEED) {
|
||||
SUCCEED() << "Explicit success.";
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests for EXPECT_EQ() and ASSERT_EQ().
|
||||
//
|
||||
// These tests fail *intentionally*, s.t. the failure messages can be
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user