Enables regex matchers on all platforms.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -126,11 +126,9 @@ using testing::internal::linked_ptr;
|
||||
using testing::internal::scoped_ptr;
|
||||
using testing::internal::string;
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
|
||||
using testing::ContainsRegex;
|
||||
using testing::MatchesRegex;
|
||||
using testing::internal::RE;
|
||||
#endif // GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
|
||||
|
||||
// For testing ExplainMatchResultTo().
|
||||
class GreaterThanMatcher : public MatcherInterface<int> {
|
||||
@@ -1249,8 +1247,6 @@ TEST(EndsWithTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ("ends with \"Hi\"", Describe(m));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests MatchesRegex().
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(MatchesRegexTest, MatchesStringMatchingGivenRegex) {
|
||||
@@ -1269,8 +1265,8 @@ TEST(MatchesRegexTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
|
||||
Matcher<const std::string> m1 = MatchesRegex(string("Hi.*"));
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ("matches regular expression \"Hi.*\"", Describe(m1));
|
||||
|
||||
Matcher<const char*> m2 = MatchesRegex(new RE("[a-z].*"));
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ("matches regular expression \"[a-z].*\"", Describe(m2));
|
||||
Matcher<const char*> m2 = MatchesRegex(new RE("a.*"));
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ("matches regular expression \"a.*\"", Describe(m2));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests ContainsRegex().
|
||||
@@ -1291,10 +1287,9 @@ TEST(ContainsRegexTest, CanDescribeSelf) {
|
||||
Matcher<const std::string> m1 = ContainsRegex("Hi.*");
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ("contains regular expression \"Hi.*\"", Describe(m1));
|
||||
|
||||
Matcher<const char*> m2 = ContainsRegex(new RE("[a-z].*"));
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ("contains regular expression \"[a-z].*\"", Describe(m2));
|
||||
Matcher<const char*> m2 = ContainsRegex(new RE("a.*"));
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ("contains regular expression \"a.*\"", Describe(m2));
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif // GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests for wide strings.
|
||||
#if GTEST_HAS_STD_WSTRING
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ using testing::AtMost;
|
||||
using testing::Between;
|
||||
using testing::Cardinality;
|
||||
using testing::CardinalityInterface;
|
||||
using testing::ContainsRegex;
|
||||
using testing::Const;
|
||||
using testing::DoAll;
|
||||
using testing::DoDefault;
|
||||
@@ -978,8 +979,6 @@ TEST(UnexpectedCallTest, UnmatchedArguments) {
|
||||
b.DoB(1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests that Google Mock explains that an expectation with
|
||||
// unsatisfied pre-requisites doesn't match the call.
|
||||
TEST(UnexpectedCallTest, UnsatisifiedPrerequisites) {
|
||||
@@ -1010,31 +1009,33 @@ TEST(UnexpectedCallTest, UnsatisifiedPrerequisites) {
|
||||
|
||||
// Verifies that the failure message contains the two unsatisfied
|
||||
// pre-requisites but not the satisfied one.
|
||||
const char* const pattern =
|
||||
#if GMOCK_USES_PCRE
|
||||
#if GTEST_USES_PCRE
|
||||
EXPECT_THAT(r.message(), ContainsRegex(
|
||||
// PCRE has trouble using (.|\n) to match any character, but
|
||||
// supports the (?s) prefix for using . to match any character.
|
||||
"(?s)the following immediate pre-requisites are not satisfied:\n"
|
||||
".*: pre-requisite #0\n"
|
||||
".*: pre-requisite #1";
|
||||
#else
|
||||
".*: pre-requisite #1"));
|
||||
#elif GTEST_USES_POSIX_RE
|
||||
EXPECT_THAT(r.message(), ContainsRegex(
|
||||
// POSIX RE doesn't understand the (?s) prefix, but has no trouble
|
||||
// with (.|\n).
|
||||
"the following immediate pre-requisites are not satisfied:\n"
|
||||
"(.|\n)*: pre-requisite #0\n"
|
||||
"(.|\n)*: pre-requisite #1";
|
||||
#endif // GMOCK_USES_PCRE
|
||||
"(.|\n)*: pre-requisite #1"));
|
||||
#else
|
||||
// We can only use Google Test's own simple regex.
|
||||
EXPECT_THAT(r.message(), ContainsRegex(
|
||||
"the following immediate pre-requisites are not satisfied:"));
|
||||
EXPECT_THAT(r.message(), ContainsRegex(": pre-requisite #0"));
|
||||
EXPECT_THAT(r.message(), ContainsRegex(": pre-requisite #1"));
|
||||
#endif // GTEST_USES_PCRE
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(
|
||||
::testing::internal::RE::PartialMatch(r.message(), pattern))
|
||||
<< " where the message is " << r.message();
|
||||
b.DoB(1);
|
||||
b.DoB(3);
|
||||
b.DoB(4);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#endif // GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(UndefinedReturnValueTest, ReturnValueIsMandatory) {
|
||||
MockA a;
|
||||
// TODO(wan@google.com): We should really verify the output message,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -185,10 +185,8 @@ using testing::SetErrnoAndReturn;
|
||||
using testing::Throw;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#if GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
|
||||
using testing::ContainsRegex;
|
||||
using testing::MatchesRegex;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
class Interface {
|
||||
public:
|
||||
@@ -547,7 +545,6 @@ TEST(LinkTest, TestMatchersFloatingPoint) {
|
||||
.WillByDefault(Return());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#if GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
|
||||
// Tests the linkage of the ContainsRegex matcher.
|
||||
TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherContainsRegex) {
|
||||
Mock mock;
|
||||
@@ -561,7 +558,6 @@ TEST(LinkTest, TestMatcherMatchesRegex) {
|
||||
|
||||
ON_CALL(mock, VoidFromString(MatchesRegex(".*"))).WillByDefault(Return());
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif // GMOCK_HAS_REGEX
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests the linkage of the StartsWith, EndsWith, and HasSubstr matchers.
|
||||
TEST(LinkTest, TestMatchersSubstrings) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user