gitMirror/googletest
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Running clang-format over all of GoogleTest

Browse Source 
A few tests are examining code locations and looking af the resulting line
numbers to verify that GoogleTest shows those to users correctly. Some of those
locations change when clang-format is run. For those locations, I've wrapped
portions in:
// clang-format off
...
// clang-format on

There may be other locations that are currently not tickled by running
clang-format.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 434844712
Change-Id: I3a9f0a6f39eff741c576b6de389bef9b1d11139d
This commit is contained in:
Abseil Team
2022-03-15 13:41:41 -07:00
committed by Copybara-Service
parent 8a422b8398
commit b007c54f29
126 changed files with 5799 additions and 7083 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

62
googlemock/src/gmock-spec-builders.cc
View File

@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
// Google Mock - a framework for writing C++ mock classes.
//
// This file implements the spec builder syntax (ON_CALL and
@@ -49,15 +48,15 @@
#include "gtest/internal/gtest-port.h"
#if GTEST_OS_CYGWIN || GTEST_OS_LINUX || GTEST_OS_MAC
# include <unistd.h> // NOLINT
#include <unistd.h> // NOLINT
#endif
// Silence C4800 (C4800: 'int *const ': forcing value
// to bool 'true' or 'false') for MSVC 15
#ifdef _MSC_VER
#if _MSC_VER == 1900
# pragma warning(push)
# pragma warning(disable:4800)
#pragma warning(push)
#pragma warning(disable : 4800)
#endif
#endif
@@ -195,11 +194,12 @@ void ExpectationBase::DescribeCallCountTo(::std::ostream* os) const
// Describes the state of the expectation (e.g. is it satisfied?
// is it active?).
*os << " - " << (IsOverSaturated() ? "over-saturated" :
IsSaturated() ? "saturated" :
IsSatisfied() ? "satisfied" : "unsatisfied")
<< " and "
<< (is_retired() ? "retired" : "active");
*os << " - "
<< (IsOverSaturated() ? "over-saturated"
: IsSaturated() ? "saturated"
: IsSatisfied() ? "satisfied"
: "unsatisfied")
<< " and " << (is_retired() ? "retired" : "active");
}
// Checks the action count (i.e. the number of WillOnce() and
@@ -242,13 +242,12 @@ void ExpectationBase::CheckActionCountIfNotDone() const
::std::stringstream ss;
DescribeLocationTo(&ss);
ss << "Too " << (too_many ? "many" : "few")
<< " actions specified in " << source_text() << "...\n"
ss << "Too " << (too_many ? "many" : "few") << " actions specified in "
<< source_text() << "...\n"
<< "Expected to be ";
cardinality().DescribeTo(&ss);
ss << ", but has " << (too_many ? "" : "only ")
<< action_count << " WillOnce()"
<< (action_count == 1 ? "" : "s");
ss << ", but has " << (too_many ? "" : "only ") << action_count
<< " WillOnce()" << (action_count == 1 ? "" : "s");
if (repeated_action_specified_) {
ss << " and a WillRepeatedly()";
}
@@ -398,11 +397,11 @@ UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedFunctionMockerBase::UntypedInvokeWith(
// If the user wants this to be a warning, we print
// it only when they want to see warnings.
reaction == kWarn
? LogIsVisible(kWarning)
:
// Otherwise, the user wants this to be an error, and we
// should always print detailed information in the error.
true;
? LogIsVisible(kWarning)
:
// Otherwise, the user wants this to be an error, and we
// should always print detailed information in the error.
true;
if (!need_to_report_uninteresting_call) {
// Perform the action without printing the call information.
@@ -505,8 +504,7 @@ UntypedActionResultHolderBase* UntypedFunctionMockerBase::UntypedInvokeWith(
Expectation UntypedFunctionMockerBase::GetHandleOf(ExpectationBase* exp) {
// See the definition of untyped_expectations_ for why access to it
// is unprotected here.
for (UntypedExpectations::const_iterator it =
untyped_expectations_.begin();
for (UntypedExpectations::const_iterator it = untyped_expectations_.begin();
it != untyped_expectations_.end(); ++it) {
if (it->get() == exp) {
return Expectation(*it);
@@ -526,8 +524,7 @@ bool UntypedFunctionMockerBase::VerifyAndClearExpectationsLocked()
GTEST_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_REQUIRED_(g_gmock_mutex) {
g_gmock_mutex.AssertHeld();
bool expectations_met = true;
for (UntypedExpectations::const_iterator it =
untyped_expectations_.begin();
for (UntypedExpectations::const_iterator it = untyped_expectations_.begin();
it != untyped_expectations_.end(); ++it) {
ExpectationBase* const untyped_expectation = it->get();
if (untyped_expectation->IsOverSaturated()) {
@@ -538,15 +535,15 @@ bool UntypedFunctionMockerBase::VerifyAndClearExpectationsLocked()
} else if (!untyped_expectation->IsSatisfied()) {
expectations_met = false;
::std::stringstream ss;
ss << "Actual function call count doesn't match "
<< untyped_expectation->source_text() << "...\n";
ss << "Actual function call count doesn't match "
<< untyped_expectation->source_text() << "...\n";
// No need to show the source file location of the expectation
// in the description, as the Expect() call that follows already
// takes care of it.
untyped_expectation->MaybeDescribeExtraMatcherTo(&ss);
untyped_expectation->DescribeCallCountTo(&ss);
Expect(false, untyped_expectation->file(),
untyped_expectation->line(), ss.str());
Expect(false, untyped_expectation->file(), untyped_expectation->line(),
ss.str());
}
}
@@ -633,7 +630,7 @@ class MockObjectRegistry {
<< state.first_used_test << ")";
}
std::cout << " should be deleted but never is. Its address is @"
<< it->first << ".";
<< it->first << ".";
leaked_count++;
}
if (leaked_count > 0) {
@@ -712,8 +709,7 @@ void Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(const void* mock_obj)
// Returns the reaction Google Mock will have on uninteresting calls
// made on the given mock object.
internal::CallReaction Mock::GetReactionOnUninterestingCalls(
const void* mock_obj)
GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(internal::g_gmock_mutex) {
const void* mock_obj) GTEST_LOCK_EXCLUDED_(internal::g_gmock_mutex) {
internal::MutexLock l(&internal::g_gmock_mutex);
return (g_uninteresting_call_reaction.count(mock_obj) == 0)
? internal::intToCallReaction(
@@ -873,8 +869,8 @@ Expectation::~Expectation() {}
void Sequence::AddExpectation(const Expectation& expectation) const {
if (*last_expectation_ != expectation) {
if (last_expectation_->expectation_base() != nullptr) {
expectation.expectation_base()->immediate_prerequisites_
+= *last_expectation_;
expectation.expectation_base()->immediate_prerequisites_ +=
*last_expectation_;
}
*last_expectation_ = expectation;
}
@@ -903,6 +899,6 @@ InSequence::~InSequence() {
#ifdef _MSC_VER
#if _MSC_VER == 1900
# pragma warning(pop)
#pragma warning(pop)
#endif
#endif