Adds tests for EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE and reduces the golden file bloat (by Zhanyong Wan). Fixes more warnings on Windows (by Vlad Losev).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -61,11 +61,16 @@ else:
|
||||
GOLDEN_NAME = 'gtest_output_test_golden_lin.txt'
|
||||
|
||||
PROGRAM_PATH = os.path.join(gtest_test_utils.GetBuildDir(), PROGRAM)
|
||||
|
||||
# At least one command we exercise must not have the
|
||||
# --gtest_internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests flag.
|
||||
COMMAND_WITH_COLOR = PROGRAM_PATH + ' --gtest_color=yes'
|
||||
COMMAND_WITH_TIME = (PROGRAM_PATH + ' --gtest_print_time '
|
||||
+ '--gtest_filter="FatalFailureTest.*:LoggingTest.*"')
|
||||
'--gtest_internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests '
|
||||
'--gtest_filter="FatalFailureTest.*:LoggingTest.*"')
|
||||
COMMAND_WITH_DISABLED = (PROGRAM_PATH + ' --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests '
|
||||
+ '--gtest_filter="*DISABLED_*"')
|
||||
'--gtest_internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests '
|
||||
'--gtest_filter="*DISABLED_*"')
|
||||
|
||||
GOLDEN_PATH = os.path.join(gtest_test_utils.GetSourceDir(),
|
||||
GOLDEN_NAME)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -60,6 +60,8 @@
|
||||
using testing::ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter;
|
||||
using testing::TestPartResultArray;
|
||||
|
||||
using testing::internal::String;
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests catching fatal failures.
|
||||
|
||||
// A subroutine used by the following test.
|
||||
@@ -958,6 +960,10 @@ class BarEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
GTEST_DEFINE_bool_(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests, false,
|
||||
"This flag causes the program to skip test environment "
|
||||
"tests and ad hoc tests.");
|
||||
|
||||
// The main function.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The idea is to use Google Test to run all the tests we have defined (some
|
||||
@@ -968,6 +974,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) {
|
||||
// We will use a separate Python script to compare the output of
|
||||
// this program with the golden file.
|
||||
testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
|
||||
if (argc >= 2 &&
|
||||
String(argv[1]) == "--gtest_internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests")
|
||||
GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = true;
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
|
||||
if (testing::internal::GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test) != "") {
|
||||
@@ -978,6 +987,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
|
||||
|
||||
if (GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests))
|
||||
return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
|
||||
|
||||
// Registers two global test environments.
|
||||
// The golden file verifies that they are set up in the order they
|
||||
// are registered, and torn down in the reverse order.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -536,20 +536,9 @@ Expected fatal failure.
|
||||
33 FAILED TESTS
|
||||
[0;33m YOU HAVE 1 DISABLED TEST
|
||||
|
||||
[mThe non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.
|
||||
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure
|
||||
Value of: false
|
||||
Actual: false
|
||||
Expected: true
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure
|
||||
Value of: 3
|
||||
Expected: 2
|
||||
Note: Google Test filter = FatalFailureTest.*:LoggingTest.*
|
||||
[mNote: Google Test filter = FatalFailureTest.*:LoggingTest.*
|
||||
[==========] Running 4 tests from 2 test cases.
|
||||
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
|
||||
FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.
|
||||
BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.
|
||||
[----------] 3 tests from FatalFailureTest
|
||||
[ RUN ] FatalFailureTest.FatalFailureInSubroutine
|
||||
(expecting a failure that x should be 1)
|
||||
@@ -589,14 +578,6 @@ Expected: (3) >= (a[i]), actual: 3 vs 6
|
||||
[----------] 1 test from LoggingTest (? ms total)
|
||||
|
||||
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
|
||||
BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure
|
||||
Failed
|
||||
Expected non-fatal failure.
|
||||
FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure
|
||||
Failed
|
||||
Expected fatal failure.
|
||||
[==========] 4 tests from 2 test cases ran. (? ms total)
|
||||
[ PASSED ] 0 tests.
|
||||
[ FAILED ] 4 tests, listed below:
|
||||
@@ -608,34 +589,12 @@ Expected fatal failure.
|
||||
4 FAILED TESTS
|
||||
YOU HAVE 1 DISABLED TEST
|
||||
|
||||
The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.
|
||||
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure
|
||||
Value of: false
|
||||
Actual: false
|
||||
Expected: true
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure
|
||||
Value of: 3
|
||||
Expected: 2
|
||||
Note: Google Test filter = *DISABLED_*
|
||||
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
|
||||
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
|
||||
FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.
|
||||
BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.
|
||||
[----------] 1 test from DisabledTestsWarningTest
|
||||
[ RUN ] DisabledTestsWarningTest.DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning
|
||||
[ OK ] DisabledTestsWarningTest.DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning
|
||||
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
|
||||
BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure
|
||||
Failed
|
||||
Expected non-fatal failure.
|
||||
FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: Failure
|
||||
Failed
|
||||
Expected fatal failure.
|
||||
[==========] 1 test from 1 test case ran.
|
||||
[ PASSED ] 1 test.
|
||||
[ FAILED ] 0 tests, listed below:
|
||||
|
||||
0 FAILED TESTS
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -483,18 +483,9 @@ Expected fatal failure.
|
||||
36 FAILED TESTS
|
||||
YOU HAVE 1 DISABLED TEST
|
||||
|
||||
The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.
|
||||
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: error: Value of: false
|
||||
Actual: false
|
||||
Expected: true
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: error: Value of: 3
|
||||
Expected: 2
|
||||
Note: Google Test filter = FatalFailureTest.*:LoggingTest.*
|
||||
[==========] Running 4 tests from 2 test cases.
|
||||
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
|
||||
FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.
|
||||
BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.
|
||||
[----------] 3 tests from FatalFailureTest
|
||||
[ RUN ] FatalFailureTest.FatalFailureInSubroutine
|
||||
(expecting a failure that x should be 1)
|
||||
@@ -529,12 +520,6 @@ gtest_output_test_.cc:#: error: Expected: (3) >= (a[i]), actual: 3 vs 6
|
||||
[----------] 1 test from LoggingTest (? ms total)
|
||||
|
||||
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
|
||||
BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: error: Failed
|
||||
Expected non-fatal failure.
|
||||
FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: error: Failed
|
||||
Expected fatal failure.
|
||||
[==========] 4 tests from 2 test cases ran. (? ms total)
|
||||
[ PASSED ] 0 tests.
|
||||
[ FAILED ] 4 tests, listed below:
|
||||
@@ -546,30 +531,12 @@ Expected fatal failure.
|
||||
4 FAILED TESTS
|
||||
YOU HAVE 1 DISABLED TEST
|
||||
|
||||
The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.
|
||||
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: error: Value of: false
|
||||
Actual: false
|
||||
Expected: true
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: error: Value of: 3
|
||||
Expected: 2
|
||||
Note: Google Test filter = *DISABLED_*
|
||||
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
|
||||
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
|
||||
FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.
|
||||
BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.
|
||||
[----------] 1 test from DisabledTestsWarningTest
|
||||
[ RUN ] DisabledTestsWarningTest.DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning
|
||||
[ OK ] DisabledTestsWarningTest.DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning
|
||||
[----------] Global test environment tear-down
|
||||
BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: error: Failed
|
||||
Expected non-fatal failure.
|
||||
FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.
|
||||
gtest_output_test_.cc:#: error: Failed
|
||||
Expected fatal failure.
|
||||
[==========] 1 test from 1 test case ran.
|
||||
[ PASSED ] 1 test.
|
||||
[ FAILED ] 0 tests, listed below:
|
||||
|
||||
0 FAILED TESTS
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -869,37 +869,58 @@ TEST_F(ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterWithThreadsTest,
|
||||
|
||||
#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE && GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests EXPECT_{,NON}FATAL_FAILURE{,ON_ALL_THREADS}.
|
||||
// Tests EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE{,ON_ALL_THREADS}.
|
||||
|
||||
typedef ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest ExpectFailureTest;
|
||||
typedef ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest ExpectFatalFailureTest;
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFaliure) {
|
||||
TEST_F(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CatchesFatalFaliure) {
|
||||
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Expected fatal failure.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) {
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
|
||||
"Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
|
||||
TEST_F(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CatchesFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
|
||||
// We have another test below to verify that the macro catches fatal
|
||||
// failures generated on another thread.
|
||||
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
|
||||
"Expected fatal failure.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
|
||||
"Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
||||
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can be used in a non-void
|
||||
// function even when the statement in it contains ASSERT_*.
|
||||
|
||||
int NonVoidFunction() {
|
||||
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_TRUE(false), "");
|
||||
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(FAIL(), "");
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests that the EXPECT_{,NON}FATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS} accepts
|
||||
// a statement that contains a macro which expands to code containing
|
||||
// an unprotected comma.
|
||||
TEST_F(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanBeUsedInNonVoidFunction) {
|
||||
NonVoidFunction();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(statement, ...) doesn't abort the
|
||||
// current function even though 'statement' generates a fatal failure.
|
||||
|
||||
void DoesNotAbortHelper(bool* aborted) {
|
||||
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(ASSERT_TRUE(false), "");
|
||||
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(FAIL(), "");
|
||||
|
||||
*aborted = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ExpectFatalFailureTest, DoesNotAbort) {
|
||||
bool aborted = true;
|
||||
DoesNotAbortHelper(&aborted);
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(aborted);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests that the EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS} accepts a
|
||||
// statement that contains a macro which expands to code containing an
|
||||
// unprotected comma.
|
||||
|
||||
static int global_var = 0;
|
||||
#define GTEST_USE_UNPROTECTED_COMMA_ global_var++, global_var++
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, AcceptsMacroThatExpandsToUnprotectedComma) {
|
||||
TEST_F(ExpectFatalFailureTest, AcceptsMacroThatExpandsToUnprotectedComma) {
|
||||
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
|
||||
GTEST_USE_UNPROTECTED_COMMA_;
|
||||
AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE);
|
||||
@@ -909,7 +930,28 @@ TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, AcceptsMacroThatExpandsToUnprotectedComma) {
|
||||
GTEST_USE_UNPROTECTED_COMMA_;
|
||||
AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE);
|
||||
}, "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE{,ON_ALL_THREADS}.
|
||||
|
||||
typedef ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest ExpectNonfatalFailureTest;
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CatchesNonfatalFailure) {
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
|
||||
"Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CatchesNonfatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
|
||||
// We have another test below to verify that the macro catches
|
||||
// non-fatal failures generated on another thread.
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
|
||||
"Expected non-fatal failure.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests that the EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS} accepts a
|
||||
// statement that contains a macro which expands to code containing an
|
||||
// unprotected comma.
|
||||
TEST_F(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, AcceptsMacroThatExpandsToUnprotectedComma) {
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
|
||||
GTEST_USE_UNPROTECTED_COMMA_;
|
||||
AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE);
|
||||
@@ -3091,6 +3133,20 @@ TEST(AssertionSyntaxTest, BasicAssertionsBehavesLikeSingleStatement) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
|
||||
// Tests that the compiler will not complain about unreachable code in the
|
||||
// EXPECT_THROW/EXPECT_ANY_THROW/EXPECT_NO_THROW macros.
|
||||
TEST(ExpectThrowTest, DoesNotGenerateUnreachableCodeWarning) {
|
||||
int n = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_THROW(throw 1, int);
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_THROW(n++, int), "");
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_THROW(throw 1, const char*), "");
|
||||
EXPECT_NO_THROW(n++);
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_NO_THROW(throw 1), "");
|
||||
EXPECT_ANY_THROW(throw 1);
|
||||
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(EXPECT_ANY_THROW(n++), "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(AssertionSyntaxTest, ExceptionAssertionsBehavesLikeSingleStatement) {
|
||||
if (false)
|
||||
EXPECT_THROW(1, bool);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user