Remove silly claim that C++ lacks lambdas.
The document itself uses lambdas later, all the scaffolding to work around lack of lambdas should be considered for removal, but that is much larger an effort than I can commit to.
This commit is contained in:
		@@ -1920,9 +1920,9 @@ using ::testing::_;
 | 
			
		||||
  // second argument DoThis() receives.
 | 
			
		||||
```
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Arghh, you need to refer to a mock function argument but C++ has no
 | 
			
		||||
lambda (yet), so you have to define your own action. :-( Or do you
 | 
			
		||||
really?
 | 
			
		||||
Arghh, you need to refer to a mock function argument but your version
 | 
			
		||||
of C++ has no lambdas, so you have to define your own action. :-(
 | 
			
		||||
Or do you really?
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Well, Google Mock has an action to solve _exactly_ this problem:
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
 
 | 
			
		||||
@@ -1773,9 +1773,9 @@ using ::testing::_;
 | 
			
		||||
  // second argument DoThis() receives.
 | 
			
		||||
```
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Arghh, you need to refer to a mock function argument but C++ has no
 | 
			
		||||
lambda (yet), so you have to define your own action. :-( Or do you
 | 
			
		||||
really?
 | 
			
		||||
Arghh, you need to refer to a mock function argument but your version
 | 
			
		||||
of C++ has no lambdas, so you have to define your own action. :-(
 | 
			
		||||
Or do you really?
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Well, Google Mock has an action to solve _exactly_ this problem:
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
 
 | 
			
		||||
@@ -1841,9 +1841,9 @@ using ::testing::_;
 | 
			
		||||
  // second argument DoThis() receives.
 | 
			
		||||
```
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Arghh, you need to refer to a mock function argument but C++ has no
 | 
			
		||||
lambda (yet), so you have to define your own action. :-( Or do you
 | 
			
		||||
really?
 | 
			
		||||
Arghh, you need to refer to a mock function argument but your version
 | 
			
		||||
of C++ has no lambdas, so you have to define your own action. :-(
 | 
			
		||||
Or do you really?
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Well, Google Mock has an action to solve _exactly_ this problem:
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
 
 | 
			
		||||
@@ -1869,9 +1869,9 @@ using ::testing::_;
 | 
			
		||||
  // second argument DoThis() receives.
 | 
			
		||||
```
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Arghh, you need to refer to a mock function argument but C++ has no
 | 
			
		||||
lambda (yet), so you have to define your own action. :-( Or do you
 | 
			
		||||
really?
 | 
			
		||||
Arghh, you need to refer to a mock function argument but your version
 | 
			
		||||
of C++ has no lambdas, so you have to define your own action. :-(
 | 
			
		||||
Or do you really?
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Well, Google Mock has an action to solve _exactly_ this problem:
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
 
 | 
			
		||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user